Showing posts with label eHealth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eHealth. Show all posts

Thursday, March 1, 2012

China started to issue citizen health card

China started to issue health card to citizens, starting with these few provinces - He Nan, Inner Mongalia and Guang Dong.


The citizen health card contains the following information

1) Patient Information
  • Patient Identification
  • Patient Demographic
  • Next of Kin
2) Card Identification Information
  • Basic Card Data
  • Issuing Organization
3) Basic Health Data
  • Vital Sign
  • Immunization
  • Medication Allergy
4) Administrative Data
  • Patient Visit
  • Billing
More can be found at the following site

http://henan.qq.com/a/20120302/000003.htm

Tuesday, February 28, 2012

Australia PCEHR

Every nation wide EHR implementation is challenging, Australia's PCEHE is not alone, as what I quoted at the bottom of this post, there are both technical challenges and political challenges. However what I found good about PCEHR is the transparency and a lot of information is publicly available for discussion and comment. Here I list out few such documents I googled on the internet, which I found useful for sharing.

1. PCEHR Concept of Operations

The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of the Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record (PCEHR) System and how it will work.

Click here to access the document.

2. PCEHR Standards Review Final Selection of Standards

This report outlines the processes used in carrying out the PCEHR Standards Review, considers progress since previous related reviews and presents findings and recommendations for the proposed PCEHR system.

Click here to access the various documents.

3. Health CIO Paul Madden clears air on PCEHR standards debate

SPECIFICATIONS for a key part of the $500 million personally controlled e-health record have been released and a vendor portal launched to support software developers working on products for the system.

Click here for more.


4. Comments on the senate enquiry on the PCEHR

Click here for more.


Latest News w.r.t PCEHR

1) Everything you need to know about Australia PCEHR

Interestingly, advocates and critics both agree on the potential usefulness of electronic health records to improve patient outcomes and increase the potential efficiency of health services – even though evidence is scant that electronic health records, in and of themselves, improve the quality of care
It is very unlikely that the PCEHR will revolutionise health care in Australia any more than its equivalent did in the United Kingdom. From an e-health perspective, this will only come from a single shared electronic health record with clinical protocols and governance that allow health providers to collaborate with a patient in managing their health and wellbeing. But, hopefully, the steps taken in the PCEHR project will accelerate that process in Australia.

2). Labor's Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record system blows out to $760m

SPENDING on Labor's Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record system has blown out to $760 million, almost $300m more than the $466.7m budget.

The National E-Health Transition Authority has swallowed the original allocation almost whole -- it has received $466m in taxpayers' money since the PCEHR was announced by former health minister Nicola Roxon in 2010.

3). E-health records' $1m a day bill

KEVIN Rudd's plan for a popular, patient-centric e-health record system - announced to general head-scratching in early 2010 - has morphed into a lumbering monster that remains frustratingly out of everyone's grasp.

Allocated a mysteriously precise sum of $466.7m over two years in that budget, it now appears the decision was made by the boss in a hurry, without the benefit of proper cabinet consideration as former health minister Nicola Roxon revealed last week.


Monday, December 12, 2011

Building Foundation going beyond EHR

Last Month I attended 3rd Annual Electronic Health Records (EHR) Asia 2011, during pre-conference workshop, I shared my experience in building adaptive enterprise foundation that goes beyond the current EHR capabilities. Below I summarized the key challenges we faced and the approaches of tackling these issues so that EHR scales up progressively to meet ongoing business needs.


1. Plan and design enterprise architecture with business capability centric view to support end-to-end care giving.

The boundary between EMR and summary care record EHR becomes increasingly fuzzy. Traditionally we plan IT systems from care setting perspective, however due to the fact that healthcare delivery is undergoing transformation to support patient centric care giving from primary care, inpatient acute care and the step-down care, there is increasing need for more efficient information flow to support seamless integration of care giving and transfer.

Just like Service Oriented Architecture design, enterprise architecture planning needs to be driven with "SOA style" - Business capability as Service, care setting is the context of the service, care provider/giver and patient are the consumer of the service.

2. Articulate the business benefits and value proposition from the perspective of the entire healthcare ecosystem.

The benefits of EHR is not equally shared by different stakeholders within the healthcare ecosystem, also the time of realizing these business benefits by different stakeholders are not synchronized. For example, in order to provide quality clinical analytic, we need to improve data quality at the point of data entry, however this will incur additional cost of system upgrading and might still increase the workload of data entry giving the current technology limitations and constraints. The additional workload during data entry might lead to time saving at another step of entire care giving process, also improved data quality and thus patient safety as whole.

However those benefits might not be realized immediately, thus at early planning stage, we need to highlight business value with the view from the entire care delivery perspective instead of individual setting perspective, also lays a foundation to allow different stakeholders to realize business benefits as early as possibly to drive up the adoption and at the same time progressively move up the IT capability ladder to enjoy more business benefits.

3. Role of different healthcare interoperability standards/specification

One of the question asked during the workshop is "What standard shall I use? e.g HL7v2, HL7v3, ISO13606, IHE" .

The common mistake in the current healthcare interoperability space is the notion of "all or nothing". To decide what interoperability standards to use, firstly we need to be clear that the above mentioned standards or specifications play different roles in healthcare interoperability, they are not equal, neither exclusive, they are complementary to each other to play its intended role in the entire software development life cycle.

Secondly we should define an architecture framework esp SOA reference architecture to position each respective standard/specification's role in the reference architecture to guide the overall solution design and implementation.

More detail can be found at EHR conference 2011.

Monday, October 10, 2011

Greater China eHealth Forum 2011 Takeway Points

Last week I had the pleasure to attend the Greater China eHealth Form 2011 held at Hong Kong, also had the pleasure to share with peers from Greater China about Singapore's development in Health IT standards development and SOA design.

This is the first time the eHealth organizations from Mainland China, HongKong, Taiwan and Macau jointly host the eHealth forum with the theme - Connect, Collaborate and Care.

There are well over 800 people attended this forum, with Health IT professionals from the above four regions and other overseas countries such as USA, Canada, , Germany, UK, Australia, New Zealand, South Korean, and of course Singapore,etc. Every breakout session is full attendance with over 150~ 200 people.

The forum is hugely successful, the following topics and presentations are very insightful and inspiring, and reinforced my passion to further deepen my understanding in different aspects of healthcare domain, and further collaboration with them to share my technical expertise with them.

1) China's development.

Grand vision and impressive planning from China Ministry of Health, the topic was presented by Dr MENG Qun, he is director of center for statistics information, Ministry of Health,China. The business driver of this vision is the urgent need to develop Health IT industry in China to catch up with the pace of health sector reform, delivery model transformation and the need to reduce healthcare cost.

The vision includes multi-tiered regional health network from city, province and all the way to national level integration.

I also had in-depth discussion and sharing with Prof Li Bao Luo, who is executive president of China Hospital Information Management Association, and learned from him that China is currently working on national wide EHR reference architecture and HL7 CDA implementation guide.

The sharing of China HIT market from Mr Sheldon Dorenfest is awesome and wonderful, both challenges and opportunities abound in China, it all depends how to make best use of it.

2) HK's great success

The progress and work achieved by HK hospital authority, this organization has about 1000 staff, they are responsible for the Health IT planning and execution for all the public hospitals in HK. There are many breakout sessions conducted by HK HA, I am very impressed by their terminology development, the mapping of interface and reference terminologies, and the extensive terminology services they have implemented. I am also impressed by their "can do, will do, and just did it" working culture and attitude, and all these services are developed in-house, truly impressive, salute to them!.

HK is using HL7 CDA for integration between different EMR or HIS (Hospital Information System).

3) Taiwan's development

Taiwan's achievement is equally impressive, the centralized EHR system does not store actual medical records, only longitudinal records such as patient conditions and family histories, etc, and indices that link to the actual detail medical records held in the respective EMR systems. The system integration between these EMR system is using HL7 CDA.

Another interesting development from Taiwan is their creative business models to encourage EHR adoption esp. for the GP. Dr HSU Chien-Yeh, who is present of Taiwan Association for Medical Informatics, mentioned any GP who treats patients by reusing the test results or imaging from other GP is entitled 50% of the actual lab test cost. My guess is that even though money is eventually coming from the tax payer, but the overall cost nationwide is lower than the one if doing the same test twice.

4) Macau's vision

Though Macau is small, only half mil people with only three hospitals, but they have the needs to allow these systems to fully integrate with Hong Kong and China, esp a lot of retiree from Macau try to spend retirement in neighboring cities in China such as Zhu Hai. With mainland China, HK and Taiwan are using HL7 CDA, I am sure that they will align their interoperability standards with them, maybe they are already doing it now, since I do not have much visibility, so I can't comment too much on this.

This truly reflect the theme of this conference - Connect, Collaborate and Care.


Lastly, its such pleasure to meet up and exchange ideas with many peers from Greater China market, and meet up with Prof Ed Hammond from Duke University again. BTW Mr Sheldon interestingly acknowledged that HIT grandfather title should go to Prof Hammond after realizing that Ed started HIT career earlier than him, nevertheless they are both HIT grandfather figures.

Unfortunately I missed Prof LUN KC's presentation since I was presenting my own paper at the same time slot, hope to catch up Prof Lun again to learn something they did not teach in medical schools.

One important message I got from this conference is that continuous emphasis from various speakers on the need to collaborate with each other, no single national programme can afford to create their own interoperability standards.

So what we can from these developments, and also consider that most of national EHR programmes, such as UK, Canada, Australia, are using HL7v3 messages and HL7v3 CDA as their interoperability standards, so what's left to decide when you embark on national EHR programme.

Of course, having said that, it does not mean HL7v3 CDA is perfect, though it is best at this moment. There are still a lot of wire format simplification can be applied to CDA, such as the data type simplification, and within HL7 community, there are few exchange formats are being discussed and tried out such as greenCDA, hData and the most recent one - Resource For Health (its official name within HL7 is FHIR - pronounced as 'Fire', Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resource)

All these slightly different exchange formats in fact can complement each other and eventually will be converged into one unified exchange model in the end IMO, just take note the unified exchange model does not necessarily mean one unified wire format for every use case such as lab, it is most likely to be domain specified unified wire format.

Lets see what happens in few years' time.

### END ###

HL7 FHIR APIs can fundamentally transform the rapid development of frontend web application

 Just imagine if all your backend APIs is based on HL7 FHIR API, how it will fundamentally transform your frontend web application developme...